Challenges
NED witnessed substantial growth in student enrollment since its inception, necessitating operational efficiency and service quality maintenance. Key challenges included:
Operational Challenges
- Attendance Tracking: Manual attendance tracking processes were error-prone and time-consuming as lists being printed and paper waste, too many archived.
- Communication with students and staff: Inadequate communication tools led to difficulties in conveying information to both students and staff.
- Data Fragmentation: Dependence on spreadsheets led to data fragmentation and the absence of a centralized system. Prior to the implementation of KMPUS, student progress data was scattered across various spreadsheets and manual records. This fragmentation posed challenges in obtaining a holistic view of individual student performance over time.
- Time-Consuming Compilation: Educators were required to manually gather data from diverse sources to evaluate student progress. This labor-intensive process was susceptible to errors, resulting in delays in recognizing struggling students and offering essential support.
- Limited Insights: Lacking a centralized system, educators encountered difficulties in extracting insights regarding student performance patterns, strengths, weaknesses, and learning trajectories. This absence of insight hindered their capacity to customize teaching methods according to the unique needs of each student.
- Limited Personalized Support: Due to insufficient progress monitoring, educators were unable to accurately identify students in need of personalized support. As a consequence, valuable chances to intervene and offer additional assistance to struggling students were overlooked.
Assessment Tracking Challenges
- Delayed Feedback: Educators had to manually grade and record individual assessments, resulting in delayed feedback for students. This delay adversely affected their learning process, as they were unable to promptly address and rectify their mistakes.
- Incomplete Records: When assessments were tracked manually, the increased likelihood of missing records arose from factors such as misplaced documents or oversights. The presence of incomplete assessment records created difficulties in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of a student's performance.
- Inefficiency: Educators spent significant time on administrative tasks like grading and recording assessments. This reduced the time they could dedicate to teaching, planning lessons, and providing individualised attention to students.
"The absence of a centralized, automated system truly affected our capacity to provide timely and personalized support to our students. If we had employed automated progress tracking and assessment management using KMPUS, we could have effortlessly accessed accurate data, identified students requiring assistance, provided swift feedback, and adapted teaching methods to enhance our students' learning experience".

David Russel
Director
- Lack of Centralization: Lack of a centralised data storage system required manual data correlation and increased administrative workload.
- Inefficient Student Enrollment: Manual enrollment processes involving emails, documents, and tests led to inefficiencies and errors (such as sending emails, signing documents, storing signed documents, conducting placement tests, etc.). The issue of emails being flagged as spam not only affected enrollment communications but could also impact other crucial school communications, such as announcements and updates.
- Communication Breakdown: Important enrollment information frequently ended up in spam folders, leading to confusion and hindering the enrollment process.
- Unread emails: Even when students discovered emails in their spam folders, they might not consistently check those folders, leading to missed communications.




